Last week I had the pleasure of listening to an incredible presentation by musician and teacher Francis Winston at an academic conference. His presentation (which incorporated a sax performance and rapping) was about the art of MCing being brought into music education.
Hip hop education is slowly gaining momentum in the UK, though is more established in the US. With particular individuals leading the movement such as @rapclassroom in London, as well as many others, it seems that hip hop might finally be receiving the attention it deserves and be utilised in a myriad of productive ways, and also perhaps be taken seriously as a ‘high’ art form.
However, following the interesting discussion that ensued from the presentation last week, is this something we actually want?
Although I think hip hop absolutely deserves recognition and validation as an incredible culture, where the various practices of rapping, DJing and so on require as much dedication as traditional instruments and singing, there is something about hip hop and its street origins and place in the cultural fabric of society that makes me wonder whether something of it will get lost if it is institutionalised.
I’m feeling quite torn about on the one hand being totally convinced of the positive impact of bringing rap into the classroom, yet on the other hand, concerned about the long-term implications of the co-option of hip hop by powerful elites.
The issues around hip hop education are extremely wide-ranging, challenging, even controversial. Simply defining what the term means is problematic e.g. bringing hip hop and education together; using a bit of hip hop in schools to reach a particular demographic; hip hop as its own pedagogy; or as Francis was arguing for yesterday, a form of music education specifically.
Whilst not aiming to answer any of these questions, I just thought I’d use this blog post as a way of thrashing out views for and against hip hop education as a hopefully productive means of wrestling with competing perspectives.
Arguments for
- For a long time other forms of music like jazz have been seen as worthy of study in academia, so why not hip hop? It’s time to address the music imbalance.
- If rap schools teach ‘knowledge’ (the widely held fifth element of hip hop), along with the music, then the history of the art form will be preserved and will bring wider social awareness.
- Rappers enjoy an expansion in vocabulary and arguably a greater understanding and knowledge of life as they draw from their own experiences. The focus on the ‘real’ and putting oneself out there holds the potential for identity exploration and self-discovery.
- Hip hop can reach youth who don’t have access to music education, or can’t afford instruments, or those not interested in singing. It can thus bring about greater inclusion and less elitism.
- The delivery of rap includes thinking about the diaphragm, inflection, intonation, phrasing, pitch, repetition, which is also what singers and wind musicians have to contend with.
- If hip hop was afforded the same level of analysis and exposure as other musics, it would rightly be legitimised as a high art form.
- It’s a creative way of overcoming marginalisation and dealing with constraints – whether that’s social, cultural, or economic. As the popular hip hop adage goes, “create something from nothing.”
- Hip hop offers a way of challenging the boring, stuffy, and white focus of the curriculum. Hip hop is an oppositional music form so its counter-cultural and anti-establishment ethos can only be a good thing if brought into a educational setting for the constructive and insightful challenges it may pose.
- It’s not just about hip hop as music or culture but a way of opening up dialogue about a plethora of issues – race, class, misogyny and gender, politics, commercialisation, globalisation etc.
Arguments against
- If rap is ‘taught’ in schools, does it take away something of the essence of hip hop – that it is organic, largely autodidactic, and a street culture?
- Due to hip hop’s association with the underprivileged because of it’s origins in the Bronx ghetto, it raises the question of who is ‘authorised’ to rap, and indeed teach it. Can anyone do it, or is it the preserve of the disenfranchised and disadvantaged?
- If hip hop is taken up in schools all over the country, becomes institutionalised, and shifts to ‘high art’ as jazz has, then won’t this effect ‘street’ rap? Hip hop will have so many rappers and artists that will have ‘learnt’ the craft and perhaps not ‘felt’ and come to it naturally as others have. Making hip hop mainstream through widespread teaching seems to go against the anti-establishment value system and ideology of the culture.
- Hip hop provides an important forum/space for criticising and challenging the main cultural ideals in society, so teaching it and institutionalising it breaks down one of its most important values as a music.
- There’s a question of power relations around the educated and privileged teaching hip hop to the underprivileged. In a school setting, the powerful elite could potentially be dictating what is and isn’t hip hop, or even become gatekeepers of what constitutes ‘good’ hip hop.
- There is a potential danger of hip hop becoming so embedded in the curriculum that is comes to be treated by some students as say the equivalent of maths – something they have to do and is an obligation. Students may unfortunately become preoccupied with grades and meeting top down standards, which is the antithesis of hip hop’s agenda of creativity and fun. Do we make it optional for those interested in it or a compulsory part of the curriculum?
- There is a danger of reifying hip hop – i.e. turning it into a ‘thing’. Something that is concrete and fixed when hip hop is arguably a free-wheeling, evolving, shifting and growing organism undergoing change all the time according to the practitioners and site of activity.
Final thoughts
The potential for hip hop education is diverse and multi-faceted, and as it’s in its nascent stages there is much room for discussion and debate about many of the issues listed above. Indeed, hip hop’s almost built-in self-critiquing component is what makes it such a progressive and appealing movement.
I guess one of the issues I thought about whilst writing the above is about the agenda of hip hop education – is it about hip hop getting the validation and legitimisation it so rightly deserves as ‘high culture’ (I feel strongly about this as I still find myself constantly having to justify my research area). But then that raises a slew of questions about why it needs legitimisation: From who? What does hip hop get from an elevated status? What does ‘high’ and ‘low’ art even mean in today’s world of remixed and hybrid culture?
Or, is hip hop education about reaching particular children, teenagers, even adults? Or about it being inclusive and an alternative form of engagement for those who aren’t catered for in the curriculum? Or simply a means of inspiring creativity and cultural production among young people?
I don’t have answers to any these questions but from writing this blog post, I’ve personally come to think that hip hop education done in a self-reflexive and self-critical way outweighs most, if not all, of the arguments against it. Holding the position that bringing rap into the classroom will impinge on hip hop’s street and anti-establishment values, or that it can’t be ‘taught’, has a problematic authenticity bias that suggests there is a ‘true’ or accepted way of doing hip hop, which I don’t believe is the case in our globalised, diverse and changing world.
The hashtag #HipHopEd on twitter is a useful starting point for those interested in following updates and information on hip hop education and keeping abreast of developments both in the UK and US.